Friday, January 29, 2016

Oregon: I'm Confused. And Frustrated. And Sad. And Reeling. What About You?

I’m deeply bothered. Bothered by it all. I have watched the video and I still don't think it's clear what happened. I have read the articles—both for and against the occupation. There is a part of me that wishes I could choose sides as easily as the masses I see around me. Applauding or condemning, at will, but I cannot. Maybe I know too much. Perhaps too little?

I’m not here to argue or convince. Merely to try to make sense of it all for myself. A man is dead. I didn’t know him personally, but I know folks who did. And from what I can tell, he was a good man, if imperfect. It saddens me to witness people who cheer his death, and tout that “he got what he wanted”. Probably because I see it differently. While he may have said he would prefer death to prison, it seems to me that what he really wanted was to stand up for a cause in which he believed, to support the healthy use of public lands and to stem government overreach. Were his methods the most reasonable choice? I don’t know. And I don’t think you can REALLY claim to know either. All you can know is what you would have done and what you feel is justifiable for yourself. Unfortunately, we see only a micron of what is happening on both sides of the story. We see only what each side would have us see, for that is their reality and all they can ultimately show us.

I concede that you are entitled to your opinion on the matter, as am I, but when did it become okay to dismiss the life of a man with complete disregard for the fact that he was a man? Where has our humanity gone? Have we, as a society, become so incredibly selfish that the death of another member of the human race is irrelevant? Or worse, a cause for celebration?!? Can we not agree to disagree without exacting a death sentence? Can we not be loving and accepting of one another, even when there are differences? And what of moderation? Isn’t it reasonable that we find a way to use and conserve the lands simultaneously? Every part of me believes there has to be a way to do just that. Stewardship over the land has to be the answer.

Unfortunately, moderation doesn’t sell the people. Extremes do. And if the masses can be polarized under the pretense that one side is wrong and the other right, victory can be claimed and camp set up on personal moral high ground. Ironically enough, each side will claim said victory and the right to be on that moral high ground. Go figure, right?           

Yes. I do know the leaders of the movement. They are cousins, somewhere down the line. Men I have spent days with at our family reunion. They are God fearing men who love the outdoors, ranching, horses, dancing,  and family. They are tellers of stories and practical jokers. 

To a certain degree, I understand their plight, if only as an observer. I know the fight over public land usage in the West is tense. I have been privy to it for as far back as my memory reaches. Whether it’s a fight over land use, water rights, development, mining, air space, endangered species, or a myriad of other topics, it has had a place in my life. Still, at the end of the day, he who controls the water, controls the land out here. It’s just the way it is. Anyone who tells you that water rights in the desert southwest is an easy matter is either uneducated or incredibly naïve. There is nothing easy about water rights out here. Even Senator Barry Goldwater is fabled for saying something along the lines of “We’ll sell you our gold and share our women but if you come after our water you’ll have a fight on your hands!”

This situation is not black and white from where I sit. There is no clear right and wrong. There is so much ambiguity and bias that we may never fully understand the truth of the matter.

So, I suppose, at the end of the day, my plea is simply this…


Seek to understand the whole truth in the matter, not just the truth that suits your fancy. Be moderate and reasonable as you form your opinions. Understand that when someone disagrees with you, it doesn’t make that person inferior, stupid, or evil. Just different from you. Stop the name calling and belittling. Be willing to ask the hard questions and receive the answers that come. But most importantly—see the humanity of the situation. There are, after all, humans on both sides of this fight who are doing what they believe to be right.

9 comments:

  1. My thoughts and feelings exactly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is inconceivable to me that people seems so willing to believe the worst in regard to their fellow man. I suppose it is easier to sit and stare at the television and let someone you don't know "give" you your opinion than it is to do the work it takes to research an issue and form an educated understanding of it.

    I grew up on a ranch next to the Bundy's and have known them all my life. I know this fight has been paramount in their lives for decades. It is a complex issue that few people not directly involved in it can easily understand. It takes time and hours of research but, it is possible to get a firm understanding if you truly want to know the truth instead of relying on lies and the half truths circulating around us

    I too am conflicted concerning the events in OR. I don't know what happened. I don't know if the occupation of the wild life refuge was a productive measure in the states rights fight.

    But I do know one thing! You may question these men's methods but don't ever question their integrity or their decency. They were willing to sacrifice everything for what they believe was right.

    There is,a saying "No one needs a warrior till the enemy is at your door." I admire the courage of these warriors. And by the way, the enemy has broken down the door.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is inconceivable to me that people seems so willing to believe the worst in regard to their fellow man. I suppose it is easier to sit and stare at the television and let someone you don't know "give" you your opinion than it is to do the work it takes to research an issue and form an educated understanding of it.

    I grew up on a ranch next to the Bundy's and have known them all my life. I know this fight has been paramount in their lives for decades. It is a complex issue that few people not directly involved in it can easily understand. It takes time and hours of research but, it is possible to get a firm understanding if you truly want to know the truth instead of relying on lies and the half truths circulating around us

    I too am conflicted concerning the events in OR. I don't know what happened. I don't know if the occupation of the wild life refuge was a productive measure in the states rights fight.

    But I do know one thing! You may question these men's methods but don't ever question their integrity or their decency. They were willing to sacrifice everything for what they believe was right.

    There is,a saying "No one needs a warrior till the enemy is at your door." I admire the courage of these warriors. And by the way, the enemy has broken down the door.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is inconceivable to me that people seems so willing to believe the worst in regard to their fellow man. I suppose it is easier to sit and stare at the television and let someone you don't know "give" you your opinion than it is to do the work it takes to research an issue and form an educated understanding of it.

    I grew up on a ranch next to the Bundy's and have known them all my life. I know this fight has been paramount in their lives for decades. It is a complex issue that few people not directly involved in it can easily understand. It takes time and hours of research but, it is possible to get a firm understanding if you truly want to know the truth instead of relying on lies and the half truths circulating around us

    I too am conflicted concerning the events in OR. I don't know what happened. I don't know if the occupation of the wild life refuge was a productive measure in the states rights fight.

    But I do know one thing! You may question these men's methods but don't ever question their integrity or their decency. They were willing to sacrifice everything for what they believe was right.

    There is,a saying "No one needs a warrior till the enemy is at your door." I admire the courage of these warriors. And by the way, the enemy has broken down the door.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anilee you do a very good job at being fair and balanced!! You are so right! There are always two sides of every story!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anilee, when you ask the question "Where has our humanity gone? Have we, as a society, become so incredibly selfish that the death of another member of the human race is irrelevant?" I can't help but think of the complete and utter rancor that these occupying men fueled against the 'Feds', the 'Federal Govt.', the 'BLM', They accomplished this by ignoring exactly what you point out about your kin and acquaintances: That they are "cousins, somewhere down the line. Men I have spent days with at our family reunion. They are God fearing men who love the outdoors, ranching, horses, dancing, and family. They are tellers of stories and practical jokers." These 'Feds', 'Federal Govt' 'BLM' may not all be men, ranchers or God fearing, but they are people and humanity, people who love their country, their work and their contribution to society. They believe they are serving their country, and in fact, they are. My husband has worked for the Park Service and has been made to feel a similar, albeit lesser, fear that I suspect Mr. Finicum felt before the trigger was pulled by those who brandish arms and threats in an effort to draw attention to their grievance against 'Overreaching Feds on Public Lands'. Just as those who are cheering the death of a man, your kin also seemed to forget the humanity that is behind the enemy they chose.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I in no way intended to imply that the people of the FBI weren't fighting for a cause they believe to be correct. I do not condemn them. As I said in my writing, I don't believe either side has complete claim to the moral high ground in this matter. I don't pretend to know what happened. And I don't think you can know what happened either. Even if you know someone directly involved in the matter. You only know their truth. And there are at least 2 sides to every story. We need to be discerning. That is all I was attempting to say.

      Delete
  7. Anilee, your thoughts are very perceptive. This battle has been ongoing many for years in the West. Frequently, the Federal government is quick to use the executive branch to pass unilateral edicts without the benefit of the voice of the people through the democratic process. That same branch often relies on the judiciary to provide credence to it edicts. For the people who rely on the land to pursue their constitutionally guaranteed liberty, the decision of the courts normally ensures any future prospect for redress of grievances will not gain traction. The decision by then President Bill Clinton under the authority of the Antiquities Act to create the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in 1996 is a personal sore spot. With a stroke of the pen, the President seized 1.88 million acres (30% larger than the state of Delaware) of land in Utah, handing it over to Federal control. This was done in an election year, a deft political move helping to lock in the environmental vote for his reelection. It also deeply widened the gap of mistrust of the Federal government by Ranchers and other land users in the West. By comparison, the states of Wyoming and Alaska have successfully limited the Antiquities Act dramatically reducing the long arm of Federal overreach in their states. Unfortunately, Utah didn’t have those same protections.
    I also cannot condone the threat of force by citizens against our government. As pointed out by "unknown," the people who are charged with carrying out the law of the land are good people fulfilling their duties as they have sworn. We have to handle our differences legally, within the bounds of the law. Many movements in this country have successfully used social protest to bring attention to their ideas. These protests are vital to gaining public understanding and appreciation. And many have been successful after years of sustained, peaceful protest.
    I am saddened by the death of a noble and honorable American. I sorrow for the deep loss felt by his family and friends. LaVoy's death immediately polarizes the argument on both sides. It will take tremendous perspective and understanding going forward to bring this discussion back into the realm of rational discussion; and, ultimately to raise the very important and distinctively Western land rights issues to fully and accurately frame it in the national debate. However, this is critical and absolutely required in order to bring about change in a way that keeps the constitutionally limited Federal government within bounds, and to avoid further disenfranchising the very people who benefit greatly from the use of these lands. We are first and foremost a constitutional republic...we need to write our Congressman, give money and time to those organizations that represent our interests, and engage in rational and civil discussion with the other side. This is worth repeating, it’s critical that we seek out the other side on their turf and discuss all the facts so all are informed of what’s at stake. And finally, we must support and vote for those representatives that honor and respect liberty as defined by the Constitution.
    Signed by another Bundy cousin - Patrick Gates

    ReplyDelete